Of Course There Is No Covid-19 Public Health Emergency
Hospitals are not overwhelmed and cases are meaningless
I drove by a large hospital twice a day on my way to and from the school I taught at last year, and not one single time did I see an ambulance rush a patient to emergency room doors. And this, oddly, during a “pandemic.”
As I passed the large sign outside the hospital that read “Vaccines Save Lives,” a curious declaration considering the fact that the Pfizer “vaccine” did not even pass the all-cause mortality end point during its key clinical trial, I did not once hear blaring sirens or see flashing lights. There weren’t any triage tents set up in the parking lot either.
My daily travels past the not overwhelmed hospital also took place during the winter Omicron wave, when the media peddled incessant fear-porn of a deadly viral contagion that would infect people and lead to hospital bed shortages if everybody did get “vaccinated” right away with the miracle shots. Right before Christmas, a not-so-cheery holiday message from the White House told the “unvaccinated” that they would die from the super-duper virus if they didn’t do the “right thing” and become lab rats in the bio-fascist security state. But, at that point in the “pandemic” - after many months of the “vaccines” obvious failure - only the stupidest of schlubs would get injected with an ancestral spike protein that could not possibly address the then circulating virus variant because the government told them to do so.
Our malevolent overlord’s dark winter prediction never came to fruition. It turned out that more of the“unvaccinated” - like this here Warrior Monk - lived to tell the tale of the so-called Omicron plague (still raging with those scary sub-variants), because the virus does not preferentially kill those who have refused the gene-jab, like our insidious public health officials continue to claim. The virus, to this day, infects (and reinfects) and kills the “vaccinated” and “boosted” at higher rates, because of original antigenic sin and antibody-dependent enhancement, the latter of which the late, great Nobel Prize winning virologist, Luc Montagnier, warned about over a year ago.
Furthermore, in a January 2022 Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, Montagnier referred to the shots negative efficacy as one of the primary reasons the contested - and ultimately defeated - “vaccine” mandate made zero scientific sense. Not long before his passing, during a speech in Milan, Italy, Motagnier said that the “unvaccinated will save humanity,” a bold statement from a man of such eminence.
But a “vaccine” for Covid-19 was never necessary to begin with, even if it was “safe and effective” and not a gene-editing, DNA altering, toxic junk-jab.
We have known since at least March of 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 presents little more of a threat to the public than influenza. Michael Levitt, a Stanford University professor and Nobel Prize winning biostatistician, analyzed the Diamond Princess Cruise ship data in March of 2020 to determine that one’s “risk of dying from Covid is equivalent to the natural risk of dying in the next month.” Healthy people, even the extremely elderly, like Sister Andre, the 117-year-old French nun who recovered from the “killer virus” in the winter of 2021, and who recently became the world’s oldest person on her 118th birthday, never had anything to worry about at all.
Nearly all “Covid deaths” occur in people already profoundly ill; for instance, 9 out of 10 have a serious preexisting condition, and nearly 65% have 6 or more co-morbidities, according to the CDC’s data. These deaths are with Covid, not from Covid, obviously. Even the sickest amongst us would nearly all survive if everyone had universal access to early treatment and life saving drugs like those promoted by the Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and heroic doctors like Dr. George Fareed and Dr. Brian Tyson.
Moreover, back in March 2020, famed epidemiologist, John Ioannidis, a colleague of Levitt at Stanford, wrote in an Op-Ed for Stat News that “reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless.” His paper on the infection fatality rate for Covid-19, the meaningful measurement of disease severity, is currently published on the WHO’s Bulletin: It shows that the overall IFR hovers around 0.2%, and for those under 70 years of age, it is 0.05%. Ioannidis’s findings, originally submitted to the WHO in May of 2020, aligned with many initial estimates throughout the world right from the start of the scamdemic.1
But the Covid fraud continues: The Biden Administration last Friday extended the “Covid-19 public health emergency" for another three months. This declaration led mRNA technology inventor and medical freedom fighter, Dr. Robert Malone, to ask in a recent Substack post: “Is there a medical emergency?” If the question needs asking, though, the answer is obviously no; of course there isn’t a medical emergency, and Dr. Malone concluded his post by affirming this fact.
And this brings me back to my anecdote about my daily commute to school.
Many remain unaware that hospitals are often strained, because before 2020 the media didn’t bludgeon us over the head with the societal impact of other respiratory pathogens. The 2017-2018 flu year serves as a pertinent example of sick patients putting pressure on hospitals all throughout the country.
An article published in Time Magazine from January 2018 maintains:
The 2017-2018 influenza epidemic is sending people to hospitals and urgent-care centers in every state, and medical centers are responding with extraordinary measures: asking staff to work overtime, setting up triage tents, restricting friends and family visits and canceling elective surgeries, to name a few.
Dr. Alfred Tallia, professor and chair of family medicine at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center in New Brunswick, New Jersey, is quoted in the article as saying: “I’ve been in practice for 30 years, and it’s been a good 15 or 20 years since I’ve seen a flu-related illness scenario like we’ve had this year.”
Apparently, every two decades the flu virus strains hospital capacity. One would think that Intensive Care Unit beds would always be on reserve if this is the case. But, of course not: Hospitals have cut costs by eliminating unprofitable beds for years; the results of such decisions are borne out in crises like the 2017-2018 flu epidemic.
For example, in California, a particularly “hard hit” state, “several hospitals” had to erect “surge tents outside their emergency departments to accommodate and treat flu patients” and “emergency departments had standing-room only, and some patients had to be treated in hallways.” The Lehigh Valley Health Network in Allentown, Pennsylvania had it even worse, with one hospital spokesman claiming that on a single Tuesday “upwards of about 40 people [were treated] in the [surge] tent itself.”
The article goes on:
In Fenton, Missouri, SSM Health St. Clare Hospital has opened its emergency overflow wing, as well as all outpatient centers and surgical holding centers, to make more beds available to patients who need them. Nurses are being “pulled from all floors to care for them,” says registered nurse Jennifer Braciszewski, and are being offered an increased hourly rate to work above and beyond their normal schedules.
So during the nation-wide flu epidemic four years ago, nurses were “offered an increased hourly rate to work above and beyond their normal schedules,” while during this current “pandemic,” doctors and nurses are fired en masse for their refusal to take part in a massive “vaccine” experiment.
But doctors and nurses can’t get fired during a health emergency, right?
Something’s not adding up here.
And to think that we never forced toddlers to mask during the influenza epidemic of 2017-2018, or put healthy people under de facto house arrest. I mean, they could have at least filled skateparks with sand and taken down basketball hoops to “slow the spread” and save some grandmas.
But nothing of the sort occurred. Life went on as normal. A not-fit-for-purpose PCR test was never employed on a mass scale, which could have resulted in many people thinking they were disease carriers when they most certainly were not, like during the whopping cough “epidemic that wasn’t” at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, in New Hampshire.
This notable episode took place in the spring of 2006, when some hospital workers developed a persistent cough, causing an infectious disease specialist to overreact like they typically seem to do.
Before long, Dr. Kathryn Kirkland, an infectious disease specialist at Dartmouth, had a chilling thought: Could she be seeing the start of a whooping cough epidemic? By late April, other health care workers at the hospital were coughing, and severe, intractable coughing is a whooping cough hallmark. And if it was whooping cough, the epidemic had to be contained immediately because the disease could be deadly to babies in the hospital and could lead to pneumonia in the frail and vulnerable adult patients there.
It was the start of a bizarre episode at the medical center: the story of the epidemic that wasn’t.
For months, nearly everyone involved thought the medical center had had a huge whooping cough outbreak, with extensive ramifications. Nearly 1,000 health care workers at the hospital in Lebanon, N.H., were given a preliminary test and furloughed from work until their results were in; 142 people, including Dr. Herndon, were told they appeared to have the disease; and thousands were given antibiotics and a vaccine for protection. Hospital beds were taken out of commission, including some in intensive care.
Then, about eight months later, health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm.
It turned out that everyone at this hospital lost their shit over the common cold. Definitive laboratory tests could not grow the Bordetella pertussis bacterium; nobody contracted whooping cough in this hospital. Epidemiologist then had to admit that they “placed too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test,” the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.
The Times writer maintains that “many of the new molecular tests are quick but technically demanding, and each laboratory may do them in its own way…their very sensitivity makes false positives likely, and when hundreds or thousands of people are tested, as occurred at Dartmouth, false positives can make it seem like there is an epidemic.”
Since a pertussis infection can present the same symptoms as the common cold, everyone with a sniffle got tested:
But neither coughing long and hard nor even whooping is unique to pertussis infections, and many people with whooping cough have symptoms that like those of common cold: a runny nose or an ordinary cough.
“Almost everything about the clinical presentation of pertussis, especially early pertussis, is not very specific,” Dr. Kirkland said.
That was the first problem in deciding whether there was an epidemic at Dartmouth.
The second was with P.C.R., the quick test to diagnose the disease, Dr. Kretsinger said.
With pertussis, she said, “there are probably 100 different P.C.R. protocols and methods being used throughout the country,” and it is unclear how often any of them are accurate. “We have had a number of outbreaks where we believe that despite the presence of P.C.R.-positive results, the disease was not pertussis,” Dr. Kretsinger added.
At Dartmouth, when the first suspect pertussis cases emerged and the P.C.R. test showed pertussis, doctors believed it. The results seem completely consistent with the patients’ symptoms.
“That’s how the whole thing got started,” Dr. Kirkland said. Then the doctors decided to test people who did not have severe coughing.
“Because we had cases we thought were pertussis and because we had vulnerable patients at the hospital, we lowered our threshold,” she said.
What happened in this New Hampshire hospital has occurred throughout the entire world. We are still dealing with a colossal testing scandal, which has resulted in a pseudo-pandemic where many millions of people have taken an experimental mRNA gene-therapy injection that continues to cause innumerable life-altering adverse events and deaths. And all for a false sense of “protection” against an easily treatable disease with an unremarkable mortality rate.
Now, the Biden Administration refuses to abdicate their emergency powers; they want to keep the “pandemic” narrative alive so the vaccinators can get more shots in more arms - even those of babies and toddlers.
But we are not in a Covid-19 public health emergency.
In fact, there never was one.
A more recent paper published by Ioannidis puts the global IFR at 0.15% and estimates that 1.5 - 2 billion people have been infected by February 2021. Omicron and all its sub-variants have certainly reduced the IFR further, making SARS-CoV-2 indistinguishable from any other common-cold causing beta-coronavirus. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33768536/